FC 101 Radiobody

Complete vehicles for sale or wanted, post here. Trade/Business adverts, without permission from The Forum Admin will be removed.
User avatar
westfalenlandy
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:54 am
Location: Lippstadt/Germany

FC 101 Radiobody

Post by westfalenlandy » Fri Jan 26, 2018 1:07 pm

There is a nice 101 on Milweb... very comfortable for using on shows... http://www.milweb.net/webvert/a2531/90707
Semper Fidelis!
42 FG 06 - 09 FM 78 - 46 HG 60

Gordon Bennett
Maître Pâtissier
Posts: 7422
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: FC 101 Radiobody

Post by Gordon Bennett » Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:00 pm

Very nice!

User avatar
GAZ_XB9R
Pastry Chef
Posts: 550
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:53 pm
Location: Stonehaven, Scotland

Re: FC 101 Radiobody

Post by GAZ_XB9R » Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:26 pm

How much are we thinking that'll fetch?

Very nice use able truck.

Hope they've paid attention to the unseen bits and made it as corrosion proof as possible.

I would have that in a heartbeat.

On second thoughts, if everything that is listed as new, came out of a ****part blue box, then the next owner may spend a lot of money re-replacing everything.
Cheers,
Gaz


First old Landie a 1970 Lightweight.

Now a work in progress.

61 FK 61 (Spent her time in NI)

User avatar
Trickyh
Posts: 293
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:17 pm
Location: Reading, Berks

Re: FC 101 Radiobody

Post by Trickyh » Fri Jan 26, 2018 3:40 pm

GAZ_XB9R wrote:
Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:26 pm
if everything that is listed as new, came out of a ****part blue box,
I am 100% with you there brother! I wonder sometimes if they have actually seen the original part in order to copy it.. :?
Rich aka Tricky

'72 SIII 12V GS Lightweight
Sankey

andrewjsimpson1977
Cake Guru
Posts: 3613
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 3:31 pm
Location: Befordshire

Re: FC 101 Radiobody

Post by andrewjsimpson1977 » Fri Jan 26, 2018 4:01 pm

its a lovely looking example though - i would have that in a heartbeat, if the time was right

User avatar
removeduser185
Cake Guru
Posts: 3531
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:37 pm

Re: FC 101 Radiobody

Post by removeduser185 » Fri Jan 26, 2018 6:46 pm

Trickyh wrote:
Fri Jan 26, 2018 3:40 pm
GAZ_XB9R wrote:
Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:26 pm
if everything that is listed as new, came out of a ****part blue box,
I am 100% with you there brother! I wonder sometimes if they have actually seen the original part in order to copy it.. :?
I've always tried to be open-minded about the blue boxes, reasoning that, if it weren't for them, some parts for Land Rovers would be completely unobtainable. But, as I have progressed through my rebuild, I have come across problems with their products not fitting time and time again. Another one this morning - a simple thing, the rubber ring round the neck of the oil filter. Would it go on? Would it heck. Luckily, I had another one from a different supplier, fitted in the groove straight away and that was the end of it. Really annoying. Same with the "T" seals for the rear crankshaft - no use at all - spent an afternoon trying to get them into place. Went to Turners, got theirs, job done in 10 minutes! Same with brake shes - Blue Box - wouldn't even fit inside the drum. Mintex? Straight in without any effort. The thing is to be choosy, but, you can't be unless you specify. I have bought a lot of parts from Craddocks and, all too often, they are Britpart. But, Are we better with NOS when the NOS may be 40+ years old? Perhaps not if it is rubber. Ah well, soldier on!

Fred

User avatar
GAZ_XB9R
Pastry Chef
Posts: 550
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 6:53 pm
Location: Stonehaven, Scotland

Re: FC 101 Radiobody

Post by GAZ_XB9R » Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:38 pm

I totally agree Fred.

Sometimes out of necessity we may have to use Britpart.

At least they are an option, which is better than none.

NOS is not the holy grail either as they command massive prices most often or not and as you say, if the part is or has rubber / perishable parts then they may be shot too.

Its not easy. I like the idea of pegasus parts who try to develop solutions where parts become unobtainable. Pity Britpart didn't take feedback so they could retain what works (I did hear their fuel tanks were OK) and redevelop what doesn't. If they were up for that I think the MV and Series crowd would all step forward to help them be successful as its in the interest of all of us.

The ultimate aim is to keep our old girls on the road. (or on the drive a in a sorry state in my case)

She is nice though. If I had the money and drive space I'd make room for her.
Cheers,
Gaz


First old Landie a 1970 Lightweight.

Now a work in progress.

61 FK 61 (Spent her time in NI)

andrewjsimpson1977
Cake Guru
Posts: 3613
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 3:31 pm
Location: Befordshire

Re: FC 101 Radiobody

Post by andrewjsimpson1977 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:42 pm

GAZ_XB9R wrote:
Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:38 pm

The ultimate aim is to keep our old girls on the road. (or on the drive a in a sorry state in my case)
Er...I will have you know that Monty is a HE, thank you very much! :o

User avatar
removeduser185
Cake Guru
Posts: 3531
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:37 pm

Re: FC 101 Radiobody

Post by removeduser185 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:05 pm

andrewjsimpson1977 wrote:
Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:42 pm
GAZ_XB9R wrote:
Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:38 pm

The ultimate aim is to keep our old girls on the road. (or on the drive a in a sorry state in my case)
Er...I will have you know that Monty is a HE, thank you very much! :o
Oh Lord! And here's me on another post having just said we avoid controversial subjects! Now we have sex-changing Land Rovers. All machines are feminine, surely?

Fred

User avatar
Tinweasel
Maître Pâtissier
Posts: 5280
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:23 pm

Re: FC 101 Radiobody

Post by Tinweasel » Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:06 pm

Landrovers must be female, they drain your wallet, and complain hugely over little things but often soldier on through bigger more major problems and often require lots of sweet talking to get them going, I'm going to carefully avoid saying anything about looking good topless as that would be crass and could be seen as sexist and would be far too controversial! Especially if my other half happens to read this page.

Shaun
Image

Rudolf Hess was the editor of mine Kampf, so was he the first grammar nazi?

Tring, Hertfordshire

Post Reply